whatEVer
Life keeps me so busy these days!!! I’ve got my shrine to romantic love to maintain, my collection of crystals and stones to keep neat and tidy, and my extensive daily prayers for the health and happiness of babies everywhere! But I finally found the time to get to this Vanity Fair article that I’ve been hearing about, and it’s a good thing: this fellow Mr. Hitchens makes some very interesting points!
3 Responses to “whatEVer”
1 Secret Keeper 19 February 2007 @ 8:05 am
OK, I could only read the first 3 paragraphs of this article before I started wriggling in my chair. The argument is ridiculous because, of course, men don’t “need” women to be funny, but there are plenty of men who know there are funny women. It may not be on that list they reel off when they are in Crush Phase Mach I but I refuse to believe or even acknowledge that this is because it doesn’t exist!!!
I maintain that I am more funny than my SigOth and I’m not saying that to brag or anything. It’s just a fact.
2 Secret Keeper 19 February 2007 @ 8:34 am
Since I’m a masochist, I finished the article. So men have to be funny to survive their lame existence cuz they can’t have kids? Now THAT’S FUNNY!
Guess what? I can have kids, but I won’t. Why? Cuz life sucks. This world sucks. I’m not cruel (in that way). Yea, I wish life was more fair and people would just get along, but that’s mostly so I can just be left alone. Maybe that’s why I AM funny, at least if Hitchens’ logic prevails.
3 Firecracker 19 February 2007 @ 1:36 pm
I liked this: “women were quicker at identifying material they considered unfunny.” You know what’s funny? Identifying things that aren’t funny and making fun of them! Like the way people dress in Boston–not funny.
I’m funnier than my mate too. Plus I even hear him copying my jokes–or as I like to say, “material”–sometimes, and that’s the highest form of flattery, no?
Leave a Reply